4 ms·
I think that is a travesty, and not for free speech reasons. Like many, I spent some time on the site this weekend. It was incredibly disturbing, but kind of in
by reilly3000 7y ago
I think that is a travesty, and not for free speech reasons. Like many, I spent some time on the site this weekend. It was incredibly disturbing, but kind of inline of what some chan sites are about. I had an idea to try to mobilize some people to start spamming /pol/ with goodness. Pics of bunny rabbits and bible verses and MLK quotes. Anon is for all, but channers have intentionally scared off almost everybody else. If a massive amount of people meaningfully engaged with the board, started open discussions and appealed to reason, maybe some lives could be saved.
Too bad its gone. Their community will simply move and dig in, and reaching them will be much harder.