3 ms·
Perhaps Twitter has the better solution? Why not direct messages to a single user, or hash tag, etc? It's basically a way of sending messages to only a set of r
by Skywing 16y ago
Perhaps Twitter has the better solution? Why not direct messages to a single user, or hash tag, etc? It's basically a way of sending messages to only a set of recipients that wants to receive it. In your case though, there'd also be a level of encryption involved. I guess what I'm saying is, perhaps a real-world example could be close to Twitter?
- anigbrowl 16y agoWell, the idea here is to prevent third parties from knowing which senders are communicating with which recipients. If only 2 people are using such a system then obviously that's pointless, but as n increases then there are n(n-1)/2 possible conversations in progress, obscuring the pattern as well as the content of communication.