Thanks for calling me out on the cherry picking. It was unserious of me to do that. I started out convinced I’m right. You haven’t changed my mind, but I need

Thanks for calling me out on the cherry picking. It was unserious of me to do that. I started out convinced I’m right. You haven’t changed my mind, but I need to look up some info to have a firmer grasp of consequences. Informally, hate speech laws are a tool that can be wielded by whoever is in power. Either that power is trustworthy enough, or it isn’t. You haven’t given me reason to believe it is, but you’ve made me seriously question why I think it isn’t. Re: Nazis—again, it’s a tool for whoever has power. If hate speech had been a concept in the 30s, I can’t imagine Nazis not prosecuting dissenters for hate speech against them.