3 ms·
> ruin the language just so that it appeals to some people May I ask why this can be considered ‘ruin’ing? These sort of changes will be useful for all CL user
by pcr910303 7y ago
> ruin the language just so that it appeals to some people
May I ask why this can be considered ‘ruin’ing? These sort of changes will be useful for all CL users IMO.
> it's already fine for me
Maybe to you, but not for me or many, many people who went to Clojure apparently.
- a0-prw 7y agoI don't mean this in a hostile way, but seriously, just go, then. If Clojure is best for you, vaya con dios :)
- pcr910303 7y agoOkay, maybe I should clarify. I’m not a Clojure-lover; I use CL as my side project language and I love CL. I was just suggesting a way that CL can be more appealing language so that CL can reach more adoption (as CL has it’s strengths that Clojure can’t follow along).
- zeveb 7y agoSpeaking as another Lisper, I am glad that you're sticking with Lisp, not moving to Clojure. … and maybe someday you can propose your own project, something like CL21!