4 ms·
Obviously there are lots of ways you can vitiate your ability to do this by being pathologically dysfunctional, all I'm saying is that the proposition isn't a p
by YawningAngel 7y ago
Obviously there are lots of ways you can vitiate your ability to do this by being pathologically dysfunctional, all I'm saying is that the proposition isn't a priori unreasonable.
Your objection seems flawed to me in that it ignores the fact that goons can screw up just as badly on AWS as they can in a data centre.
- ethbro 7y agoApples to apples, how does a hypothetically goonish IT department screw up a managed service in the same way they can building up from bare metal?
- YawningAngel 7y agoMy first thought is spaffing huge piles of money up the wall by using expensive stuff like DynamoDB really inappropriately, but I think in general AWS is complicated in a way paying someone to plug in colo servers isn't and thus offers more scope to waste money. For random anecdata purposes, I saved $20k /month turning off unused stuff at my ~$50k /month most recent gig. Now scale that up to $1B /year
- ethbro 7y agoAbsolutely on wasted money and an easier path to financially foot-gunning. But my point was more that managed services do make it harder to technically foot-gun. When there are limited options exposed by an abstraction layer, there are limited mistakes an ignorant user can make.