4 ms·
Because Flutter has it's own rendering engine, it's inherently more consistent in refresh rates and UI components. Although React Native shows Native elements,
by gitgud 7y ago
Because Flutter has it's own rendering engine, it's inherently more consistent in refresh rates and UI components.
Although React Native shows Native elements, they vary slightly across different; devices, platforms, OS's etc.. this can create many weird edge cases, which makes it unreliable in some cases.
- bsaul 7y agoI'm actually investigating getting some skills on react native, but i've got the suspicion it isn't all sunshine and rainbows. From what i've seen so far, a real-world stack has many more dependencies other that react native itself, and becomes a convoluted mess. However, i'm surprised that i haven't found a similar post to OP detailing real-world React Native pain points. Do you have more info ?
- rhodysurf 7y agoRN pain points are upgrading more than anything else. Also as a native dev I don’t understand why the JS dev ecosystem is full of disjointed tooling instead of just making the process more streamlined. I have also developed a production flutter app for a client and am now working on a RN app for another. I like RN so much more just because I can create custom native views that use the platform toolkits. You can also share a lot of code with an SPA web app and set up a monorepo for everything pretty easily. Flutter dev tools are incredible though and much easier to use than react native.
- bsaul 7y agohow is the view animation / vc transition story on RN ? Say you’d like to implement a snapchat-like UX with RN, would that be possible without relying heavily on native custom components ?
- ex3ndr 7y agoYes
- rhodysurf 7y agoAnimation with RN is very good. Snapchat like UI is definitely possible, but for the performance to be really good youd probably want to do something native. I consider that a good thing though. RN is better if you just treat it as the coordinator on top of native view components IMO.