3 ms·
"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." As if "The Net" is a perfect, neutral, self-supporting entity that behaves with mathematic pred
by ChainOfFools 7y ago
"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."
As if "The Net" is a perfect, neutral, self-supporting entity that behaves with mathematic predictability rather than a projection of the chaotic human society on which its existence depends.
There is a widespread habit among futurists and technologists, perhaps arising from an appreciation for semantic economy and the anonymizing instinct to downplay associations between oneself and one's assertions, to use the passive voice when concocting reductive maxims of this sort.
I believe many of the moral blind spots of technocratic thinking are connected to the peculiar tendency - revealed by this passive voice framing habit - to overlook or outright dismiss the role that human inputs play in the complex systems futurists propose as solutions to human problems.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- AstralStorm 7y agoThis is extra funny because in general anyone's internet access is trivially easy to take down with just a bunch of well sent and crafted routing control packets. Internet was not designed in an adversarial model.
- feanaro 7y agoI don't think this statement is ignoring human input. It's extrapolating the result based on what we have observed about the interaction of the technology and the participating humans so far, viewing them as a single system. The passive voice is in recognition that an individual has almost no control over this system as a whole.