> Led the development of [X] feature, integrated it across [Z] products, resulting in extra [Y] in revenue The example isn't apt. "[Y] in revenue" has no conne

> Led the development of [X] feature, integrated it across [Z] products, resulting in extra [Y] in revenue The example isn't apt. "[Y] in revenue" has no connection with the engineering function, "[Y] in revenue" is a responsibility of the product, marketing and sales functions. (This then contradicts pt. 3: "Avoid false accomplishments" of the article) I'd wager technical hiring managers would be more interested in technical metrics (QPS, incident response times, etc.) than business metrics (revenue, MAU, etc.)