2 ms·

I would disagree a bit. The concern here is that we are leaving doors wide open for businesses to deny service based on their beliefs. We are accepting that peo

I would disagree a bit. The concern here is that we are leaving doors wide open for businesses to deny service based on their beliefs. We are accepting that people have no right of due process of the law and businesses can just decide to act as judge and jury to punish anyone they desire based on their beliefs. It is likely that businesses will be never exploit the extreme and be benevolent in exercising this power. However its troublesome that it can happen and that they have this power. One of the core foundation of civilized society is to remove this unpredictability, however small it may be, by establishing crystal clear laws.

panarky 7y ago
> wide open for businesses to deny service based on their beliefs Should private businesses be required to disseminate terrorist recruitment material if it's not specifically outlawed? There's a big difference between terrorist recruiting and coordination, and the peaceful debate of differing perspectives. > crystal clear laws This is an impossible standard. I reject the implication that anything not explicitly prohibited by law must be perfectly moral and ethical. It would truly be a dystopia if private individuals and businesses are prevented from making any moral or ethical judgments.