5 ms·
That's an unstable equilibrium. Good luck thought policing thousands upon thousands of journalists, each of them has an incentive to defect and get more eye ba
by internet_user 7y ago
That's an unstable equilibrium.
Good luck thought policing thousands upon thousands of journalists, each of them has an incentive to defect and get more eye balls that competition, and make more money and name for themselves.
Never going to happen, until we have full blown censorship and you only read double-plus good happy time stories.
Is that what you really want?
- nickpsecurity 7y ago"Good luck thought policing thousands upon thousands of journalists" Except you're ignoring the fact that the corporate media already does that. It seems to work well enough, too. It helps that "journalists" are mostly a thing of the past with today's reporters often just doing the minimum to check things when they're not just repeating whatever the current fad is. That's extremely popular, too. Most stories are whatever people in target demographic are either what people want to say yes to or hate on. We're already there.
- internet_user 7y agoExcept they seem to be fanning the fire instead of supressing. It's all about eyeballs.