3 ms·
The problem is that a company named Noticeboardflare has practically monopolized protection of noticeboards, and that if you do not have their approval, your no
by sb057 7y ago
The problem is that a company named Noticeboardflare has practically monopolized protection of noticeboards, and that if you do not have their approval, your noticeboard is impractical to operate.
- King-Aaron 7y agoWell yes, and ultimately noticeboardflare has the right to do whatever the hell they want. And if your noticeboard is inciting nearly weekly mass homicides, maybe the noticeboard you're trying to support is a shitty noticeboard.
- busymom0 7y ago> you're trying to support This isn't about "supporting" someone's views. This is about simply allowing one to speak. Otherwise Google should be held liable for every single illegal thing that happens on their platform (and there are ton of those).
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- ViViDboarder 7y agoI don’t think Cloudflare is trying to claim liability (that would be a bad move on their part), but just that they want no part of that kind of behavior. They don’t want to take money from or enable that kind of behavior in any way. Why shouldn’t they have that choice?
- anigbrowl 7y agoYou don't owe anything to people who are trying to kill you.
- pferde 7y agoWhat if they are trying to kill you because you owe them something? :)
- kelnos 7y ago> Noticeboardflare has practically monopolized protection of noticeboards Your opening premise isn't even true. CF has nothing near a monopoly on CDNs.