3 ms·
An anecdote from Indonesia. One of the large on-demand companies moved into food delivery a few years back. Originally, the only cost was the (subsidised) price
by ian0 7y ago
An anecdote from Indonesia. One of the large on-demand companies moved into food delivery a few years back. Originally, the only cost was the (subsidised) price of transport borne by the consumer. There was no contract with restaurants. A driver pulled up and ordered a takeaway just like a consumer would.
However after awhile, most businesses began to see a good proportion of their sales (& a lot of new customers) from these drivers. When the on-demand company started contracting restaurants with a mandetory 20% markup to the price of food, it was a no-brainer for the restaurants to go along with it. As a result, this food delivery business now subsidises the core rideshare business.
At the end of the day it's eyeballs that matter, to both the restaurant and the on-demand company. And this is where the great divide between the super-apps and the delivery startups come into play. Trying to compete with one of these big apps is like trying to compete with Amazon with some niche e-comm site. Its possible, its just very, very difficult. And of course doesn't have anywhere near the same potential value.
- erulabs 7y agoOne of the best lessons I’ve learned: a 1% chance of making 10B is worth 100M. This took a disturbing amount of time for me to digest, but it’s absolute truth. Food delivery has a very slim chance of working, but oh baby if it works.