3 ms·
While it is a bit dated in terms of the 'types' of applications it is still quite relevant in terms of understanding "web 2.0[1]" distributed system reliability
by ChuckMcM 7y ago
While it is a bit dated in terms of the 'types' of applications it is still quite relevant in terms of understanding "web 2.0[1]" distributed system reliability versus other systems.
One of the coolest things Greg Lindhal built at Blekko was a system that processed the error logs of every single system in the cluster all at the same time. It then reduced by string matching error messages that varied only by their variables into a single error (so 'error reading sector 10 on disk sda3' and 'error reading sector 20 on disk sde2' would reduce to 'error reading sector X on disk Y' x={...}, y={...}') really fun stuff. And you could easily pull out of that errors in the software (happens on many nodes) errors in hardware (happens on unrelated nodes) and errors in infrastructure (happens on nodes correlated by a switch or PDU or Rack)
[1] Distributed systems made of many many identical nodes both from a software and hardware perspective, managed by an orchestration service with software that assumes unreliable platforms.