4 ms·
The whole scientific publishing field is still stuck in previous century. We desperately need a github for science, where any reader would be a reviwer, who wou
by chr1 7y ago
The whole scientific publishing field is still stuck in previous century. We desperately need a github for science, where any reader would be a reviwer, who would be able to rate the article and comment on it, and then journals would use these ratings combined with credibility rankings of reviewers to create indexes of interesting new article-repositories.
- HNisCurated 7y agoI have people citing research with useless AMA standard. If you want both parties to agree, they need to see the Data. Most studies become uninteresting after you read their terrible data.
- chr1 7y agoAbsolutely agree, articles without data and without the sourcecode, are not science, and that's another reason why we need github for science.
- Nemo_bis 7y agoMore on this idea: http://bjoern.brembs.net/2015/04/what-should-a-modern-scientific-infrastructure-look-like/ http://bjoern.brembs.net/2015/04/what-should-a-modern-scient... http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/01/why-academic-journals-need-to-go/ http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/01/why-academic-journals-need-...