3 ms·
I disagree. The gold standard is if outside groups subject your findings to new experiments and reproduce the same results.
by mxcrossb 7y ago
I disagree. The gold standard is if outside groups subject your findings to new experiments and reproduce the same results.
- tfha 7y agoWell, there's replicating the experiment and then there's challenging the conclusion. Those are two separate ideas, and are actually fairly independent.
- Fomite 7y agoI agree with you. "I can run your code/experiment/etc. in your population and get your results" isn't the gold standard either. "We approached it from a different way, and with a different population, and we get a consistent answer" is both harder and more compelling.