EDIT - For HN Guidelines: Any obligation (other than legal) that Activision Blizzard has to paying taxes is not the point of the article. The point the article

EDIT - For HN Guidelines: Any obligation (other than legal) that Activision Blizzard has to paying taxes is not the point of the article. The point the article makes is... > The case of Activision Blizzard is just another example demonstrating the need for governments to introduce more effective measures to deal with royalty-based tax avoidance schemes. In the UK this means changing legislation to make sure that royalty payments made to companies in jurisdictions where the UK has a tax treaty are included in the charge to income tax. Also, it's clear in the header that it's not all "perfectly legal".