3 ms·
>The problem, as in the article is size though. I see it more in the amount of light needed, 50% pass-through vs. roughly 90% of conventional lenses seems to m
by jaclaz 7y ago
>The problem, as in the article is size though.
I see it more in the amount of light needed, 50% pass-through vs. roughly 90% of conventional lenses seems to me "a lot".
Even if the researchers "hope" that they will be able to improve the material/shapes/whatever, it doesn't seem like an easy chore.
- Veedrac 7y agoI would not be surprised if there are many applications where removing 90% of the weight and bulk of the lens, or adding this much flexibility in the lens' functionality, would more than make up for having to double the sensor size or light intensity.