4 ms·
I don't see any factual objective discussion in the twitter thread. Btw, I'm not a big fan of Google, which I guess is what you were implying. In fact, I think
by xurukefi 7y ago
I don't see any factual objective discussion in the twitter thread. Btw, I'm not a big fan of Google, which I guess is what you were implying. In fact, I think Google is the most dangerous tech company currently in existence and I consider it a severe threat to our society. But that doesn't mean I cannot objectively judge the technical quality of their products and put things into perspective.
- calcifer 7y ago> I don't see any factual objective discussion in the twitter thread. What do you mean? People are seeing slow queries for "powered by". Unless you think they are lying, I don't see how that isn't factual?
- xurukefi 7y agoIt's not what you say, but how you say it. This is just mindless disproportional bashing. "Come on Google I don't have all day!" "This is actually one of those crazy "facts from the future" to go back in time and tell people 10 years ago: Google has the dominant browser and mobile operating system, but their search sometimes takes 7 seconds." "@Google have you tried implementing these recommendations? https://developers.google.com/speed/" https://developers.google.com/speed/"
- calcifer 7y agoJust seems like perfectly normal snarky banter making fun of a faceless corporation. Still, you do you. I'm sure Google appreciates the peanut gallery coming to their defense for even the most trivial of issues...
- Gigablah 7y agoI, for one, support the effort to raise the signal-to-noise ratio.
- robbrown451 7y agoDoesn't seem like bashing to me. It is simply interesting.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]