4 ms·
I am an amateur computer historian, and I can confirm it went from good to shit. For instance, I run an archive at ps-2.kev009.com and there is an oldskool cgi
by kev009 7y ago
I am an amateur computer historian, and I can confirm it went from good to shit. For instance, I run an archive at ps-2.kev009.com and there is an oldskool cgi search on my site (Xapian Omega). If you search IBM P/Ns or FRUs on G, versus on my site (for stuff my archive covers), you can see it first hand. My search is exhaustive and it is readily apparent G is not. I don't recall that always being the case, G started to penalize old content, http content, and all kinds of other stuff to the point of oblivion.
This makes me sad, because I will often have very exact queries like a part number and there is content out there on the internet that I cannot locate with search.
- Avamander 7y agoI'd love Google to separate "fresh" and "old" into two different search engines. When using a new framework or a version of a language or when searching for news I don't want old results. However, when searching for a part number, old documentation, information about a person I do want old information. Right now it just seems google purges the old instead of building two indexes.
- cameronbrown 7y agoIt's better UX to make it a ranking signal from your query or the tools button.