4 ms·
I'm not clicking on that bait. Could someone change the title to something that actually says what it's about? Original title was: "Chrome 76 Has Given Billion
by Y_Y 7y ago
I'm not clicking on that bait. Could someone change the title to something that actually says what it's about?
Original title was: "Chrome 76 Has Given Billions of Google Users an Incentive to Use Firefox Instead"
- onyva 7y agoThanks. Wanted to say the same. Or please, stop posting Forbes and wsj garbage here in the future. It’s an insult to read. Regardless, ditched back to Firefox more than two years ago.
- ehsankia 7y agoThe whole article is clickbait and low effort journalism. If anything, it actually does a lot more praising Chrome? Starts up with > Chrome 76 update which brings plenty of things to like from a security and privacy perspective, and one real stinker as far as usability Then follows with 3 paragraphs of explaining the upsides. Next, there's a completely unrelated paragraph about the whole ad-blocker extension v3 kerfuffle, which then transitions into a rant about the word "omnibox". Finally half way through, we get to the crux, which is about the url simplification, which is insane to think that out of all the things people would leave Chrome for, it'd be because removing www. and https:// https://. As if average users care one bit...