3 ms·
> constantly served results to outdated tech info Just to be contrarian... maybe there's some useful signal there about why you might prefer technologies witho
by inimino 7y ago
> constantly served results to outdated tech info
Just to be contrarian... maybe there's some useful signal there about why you might prefer technologies without so much churn.
- KingFelix 7y agoOne problem I wish Google would solve is this. When I'm looking to solve a problem I've found that tons of first page results are dated but years. Adobe cc for example, they are churning updates, lots of people are having the same issues once I actually go to Adobe but the results are sometimes a decade old!
- your-nanny 7y agobut both Google and DDG let you filter by date. Does that not work for you?
- mschuster91 7y agoBiggest problem in your problem is Adobe. It's an utter nightmare to keep up with the constant UI changes - I really wish they'd invest more time in fixing crashes than moving shit around. If anyone here is at Adobe, please for the love of god hammer it into the heads of your PMs to do three or four sprints dedicated only to resolving bugs and crashes.
- inimino 7y agoJust to be clear (since downvotes and replies suggest I wasn't) my point is that if you're using a technology where anything written two years ago is out of date and now useless information, maybe instead of using a search engine that shows newer information you should rather prefer to use technologies where ten-year-old information is still relevant. I'm pretty sure anything I read about TeX today is going to continue to be useful information ten years from now. Not so much anything I read about Kubernetes or the non-relational database du jour. (Which is why I prefer not needing to read about those things ever.)