When I say you can't "not assume" a prior, I am being 100% literal. Every frequentist technique can be interpreted in a Bayesian way, and the priors always cont

When I say you can't "not assume" a prior, I am being 100% literal. Every frequentist technique can be interpreted in a Bayesian way, and the priors always contain information (which has a mathematical definition). It is also true vice-versa, but is much more awkward and complicated.