3 ms·
>"They also don’t “trump” a doctor’s judgment, they simply state whether or not the claim for medicine is covered under the plan rules" Not how it is described
by sorokod 7y ago
>"They also don’t “trump” a doctor’s judgment, they simply state whether or not the claim for medicine is covered under the plan rules"
Not how it is described in the article. Is the article incorrect in your opinion?
- lotsofpulp 7y agoI can't read the article, since it doesn't work on Safari with content blocker enabled, but it's pretty clear that a doctor is free to prescribe whatever they want. The patient is free to obtain the prescription also. The third party payer is also free to object to paying for something it believes should not be paid for under the agreement between the patient and the payer.
- sorokod 7y ago> a doctor is free to prescribe whatever they want Presumably not "whatever they want", presumably it's a bit more structured then that. > The third party payer is also free to object Aren't the patients payers too? Read the article, it's nice.