I don't get it, what's the "debate"? According to the article there is literally no advantage to motion smoothing. When motion smoothing is off, if the video is

I don't get it, what's the "debate"? According to the article there is literally no advantage to motion smoothing. When motion smoothing is off, if the video is shot at high frame rates, like TV or sports, it displays them that way as people like, and if the video is of film at 24 fps, it displays it like that as people also prefer. The article seems to try to engineer controversy by vaguely hinting that sales could be lost if smoothing weren't on for certain key edge cases, like in-store demos, but that's not the case. So the question is why is ti default at all, what's the issue?