> Like many of the 5-10% of the population living with stereoblindness, I would have called BS on this, but seems legit, just lacking a bit on nuance https:/

> Like many of the 5-10% of the population living with stereoblindness, I would have called BS on this, but seems legit, just lacking a bit on nuance https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934608/ "It is widely thought that about 5% of the population have a lazy eye and lack stereo vision, so it is often supposed that most of the population (95%) have good stereo abilities. We show that this is not the case; 68% have good to excellent stereo (the haves) and 32% have moderate to poor stereo (the have-nots). Why so many people lack good 3-D stereo vision is unclear but it is likely to be neural and reversible."