4 ms·
> Various doctor associations (AMA et al) have strangled supply side of healthcare To add more details to this here's something I recently read about the suppl
by heymijo 7y ago
> Various doctor associations (AMA et al) have strangled supply side of healthcare
To add more details to this here's something I recently read about the supply constraint and its origins.
> Then as now, Medicare reimbursed hospitals for a significant share of residents’ salaries. The Balanced Budget Act established limits on those reimbursements, effectively fixing the number of funded residents at 1996 levels. (In 1999 Congress amended the limit for rural hospitals only, increasing the numbers of funded residents at those hospitals to 130 percent of 1996 levels.) Essentially, the law stipulated that if a hospital wanted to expand its pool of residents, Medicare would not pay for it.
How could such a provision make it through Congress? Lawmakers received cover from the American Medical Association (AMA), the Association of American Medical Colleges, and other major stakeholders in American medicine who endorsed caps on funding for residents and other graduate medical education programs. In March 1997, months before the Balanced Budget Act was enacted, the AMA even suggested reducing the number of U.S. residency positions by approximately 25 percent — from 25,000 to fewer than 19,000. “The United States is on the verge of a serious oversupply of physicians,” said the AMA and other physicians’ groups in a joint statement. Since most states require at least some residency training for medical licensure, reducing the number of residency positions would curtail the supply of doctors in the U.S.
Fast forward two decades, and what once seemed like a glut now looks like a shortage. The growth in the number of residency positions — and thus the number of doctors — slowed after the passage of the Balanced Budget Act. From 1997 to 2002, the number of residents in the U.S. increased by just 0.1 percent. Although the number of positions has increased since then, each year thousands of residency applicants fail to secure a position. Factor in an aging population and a projected increase in demand for health care services, and the U.S. is now forecasted to experience a shortage of 46,900 to 121,900 physicians by 2032. Absent a meaningful response from Congress, it will be doctors — particularly residents — and their patients who pay the price.
https://undark.org/2019/07/25/looming-doctor-shortage/ https://undark.org/2019/07/25/looming-doctor-shortage/
- programmertote 7y agoThis a hundred times! The shortage is real and urgent. My gf, who is in her second year of a low-tier residency program, received many offers from various hospitals promising her $300K/year to work for them. This is well known among residents that once you survive residency (which is not a high bar to begin with), you will make at least $250K/year.
- this2shallPass 7y agoFrom the the people I know and know about, getting into medical school is a very high bar. Getting through is hard though doable if you could get in and devote your entire life to it. You probably won't get the specialty you want if it's one of the more generally desired ones, but you might. What is an isn't a high bar is all relative.
- n00j 7y agoIs $250K or 300K really that much compared to the amount of work / time these people need to spend going through formal education? With the additional stress that any decisions they make could adversely impact someone's life? I mean software developers doing significantly less work can easily make this money while working half as much right? SW Dev working 8hrs a day can make this, whereas a doctor working probable 60-80 hours a week makes the same?
- GFischer 7y agoI don´t know in which world you live where SW devs make that... some FAANG developers maybe - 5.000 to 10.000 people total? Compare to over a million doctors in the U.S. only.