3 ms·
>Except you often have to wait weeks for non-life threatening issues. So it's preferable to have a system where people go bankrupt for routine care? https://a
by minikites 7y ago
>Except you often have to wait weeks for non-life threatening issues.
So it's preferable to have a system where people go bankrupt for routine care?
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304901?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a5697b7e-8ffc-4373-b9d2-3eb745d9debb&=& https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2018.3049...
- en4bz 7y agoYou're presenting a false dichotomy. If people are being gouged then you can pass laws to limit that. You don't need single payer to solve these issues. Everyone knows the pricing system is BS. If that's the case then we should pass laws to change this.
- velcrovan 7y agoSingle payer is the best way to solve these issues though.