3 ms·
I think it will be really enticing for people that want to play sports games but don't want to invest in a console. Those customers are also not going to be the
by beefalo 7y ago
I think it will be really enticing for people that want to play sports games but don't want to invest in a console. Those customers are also not going to be the ones concerned about latency.
- izzydata 7y agoIt has no real advantages to buying a console because you still have to buy the games individually as they explained. It is no different than financing a gaming console except you could eventually pay it off unlike Stadia.
- cameronbrown 7y agoimo Stadia needs to switch to a Netflix style subscription-model to be financially viable (from a consumer standpoint)
- beefalo 7y agoI don't think it is out of the realm of possibility and I see them taking the same path as Netflix currently. They are launching with big games that people know, but they need to get people hooked with new exclusive games, and a bunch of cheap stuff so they can have the "Play 10k games for $X/month" marketing tagline.
- high_derivative 7y agon=1 but I if were considering the two options, I would simply not want one that has me owning more electronic waste (console). I am not sensitive to the price either way, but I am sensitive to owning more electronics.
- xchaotic 7y agoThere’d be almost the same amount of electronics just sitting in Google’s servers. People don’t game 24/7 but if Google want to provision for peak loads like Christmas they can’t really get away with having less?