3 ms·
The debate mentioned above was in 2012. That's many years ago, long before any recent "jingoistic bend", so I don't think it's relevant. Actually I don't see ho
by neonate 7y ago
The debate mentioned above was in 2012. That's many years ago, long before any recent "jingoistic bend", so I don't think it's relevant. Actually I don't see how it would be relevant anyway, since it has nothing to do with his actual argument in this case.
- bduerst 7y agoThiel has been on Facebook's board since 2004, so his motive is still the same. In fact, it's more evident with his more recent behavior.