4 ms·
Huh? Nothing is stopping you today from creating an image map or do table-based design, other than a client who wants a mobile-friendly design. I don't recall
by danso 7y ago
Huh? Nothing is stopping you today from creating an image map or do table-based design, other than a client who wants a mobile-friendly design.
I don't recall mentioning anything about translation. I don't know what hot-button issue you're going on about but I have a feeling it's tangential to the topic of web design.
- hedora 7y agoThe article specifically calls out css usability and rendering fidelity as things they are interested in. Pre-web, a content layout shop could apparently do about 20 designs (in three form factors each) per seat, per week. These would be done to best-practices, and also be aesthetically pleasing. I don’t think that is true for modern web design. If anyone here has that sort of design throughput, I’m guessing a lot of people on this thread would be interested in it.
- danso 7y agoI did print design (e.g. PageMaker, Illustrator, Photoshop) and web design (including Flash) in the early web days. The workflow and output is not comparable, period. Print and web layout both have their respective inherent advantages and limitations. But I think it's self evident that, in general, a webpage is meant to have far more interactive features for a far bigger audience across a far bigger variety of devices than a print design. But I'm happy to see examples of PDFs that are the exception to this.