That's what I was thinking while reading: the author is just describing economics while ignoring the fact that > The curious task of economics is to demonstrat

That's what I was thinking while reading: the author is just describing economics while ignoring the fact that > The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account (FA Hayek, The Fatal Conceit) I agree that we don't need a new field, but it seems also that the idea of designing progress is a fool's errand.