4 ms·
A much better idea would be to package it appropriately, and drop it on the subducting side of the mid-Pacific subduction zone. Approximately 1/10,000 as much
by Recurecur 7y ago
A much better idea would be to package it appropriately, and drop it on the subducting side of the mid-Pacific subduction zone.
Approximately 1/10,000 as much energy would be involved, and it would be 100% safe.
- askvictor 7y agoIs it possible to build such appropriate packaging, given the forces it will be put under before it completely 'goes under'? Also, wouldn't there be a risk of radioactive volcanoes if it doesn't disperse sufficiently (genuine question; not a geologist)
- antepodius 7y agoPretty sure the inside of the earth's radioactive anyway. Our material's a drop in the bucket. I've heard, for example, that geothermal energy generates nuclear waste (because digging so low digs up radioactive material anyway)