3 ms·
Correct. And I say over and over, it is time to evaluate the true cost of crime.
by SN76477 7y ago
Correct.
And I say over and over, it is time to evaluate the true cost of crime.
- rhacker 7y agoI think that's a different statement than the one you said earlier. Society should accept a little crime to be free != evaluate the true cost of crime. So if there's a neighborhood that has the potential to sell Condos for $1.7M each but currently has houses that are $50k and we find out that the crime in the area is keeping that value so low - should we go after the thieves for stealing $1.7M from homeowners? I'm just saying because that's one of the ways you add up the "true cost of crime".
- SN76477 7y agoIm thinking on a very small level. Policing efforts should cost less than the crime. Too often it is the opposite. I would rather someone speed through my neighborhood than have 3 police cars make a spectacle and spend thousands of dollars. Speeding is a problem fixed by a proper education (in theory) It is not fixed by chasing someone down and giving them a speeding ticket.