3 ms·
Interesting that they opted for a relational rather than a categorical one; the latter is proving to be more flexible [0]. [0] https://www.categoricaldata.net/
by agentultra 7y ago
Interesting that they opted for a relational rather than a categorical one; the latter is proving to be more flexible [0].
[0] https://www.categoricaldata.net/ https://www.categoricaldata.net/
- breck 7y agoInteresting project. Thanks for sharing.
- frenchman99 7y agoLooks like this package is maintained by a single person: https://github.com/CategoricalData/CQL https://github.com/CategoricalData/CQL Not sure it's comparable to something like Amazon, that has probably dedicated funding.
- cheez 7y agoHow is it proving to be more flexible?
- wisnesky 7y agoI'd be happy to showcase our recent progress. But let's connect offline, so as not to hijack the conversation. Feel free to drop me a line at ryan@conexus.ai.
- cwyers 7y agoInteresting that they opted for the single-most popular query language on the planet, versus somebody's hobby project? Why is that interesting?