>Considering fingerprint analysis is pseudoscience and almost entirely made up Quite the stretch to go from "non-zero-error rates" to "made up pseudoscience" i

>Considering fingerprint analysis is pseudoscience and almost entirely made up Quite the stretch to go from "non-zero-error rates" to "made up pseudoscience" isn't it? It's a problem if people are being convicted on fingerprint analysis alone. But as a piece of the puzzle, when combined with other evidence, what is the issue?