I don't recall; the numbers on Catie (~1 in 1250) are more modern and certainly a better estimate. Either way, you only have to add a few more digits of risk m

I don't recall; the numbers on Catie (~1 in 1250) are more modern and certainly a better estimate. Either way, you only have to add a few more digits of risk mitigation and you're more likely to die in a car accident. A test that had even a 1% false negative rate would cover most of that ground.