2 ms·
He could ad : ads kill information. As an example, google "cbd oil vs cbd isolate" or "why is cbd isolate in powder form...", in order to understand the differ
by w1nst0nsm1th 7y ago
He could ad : ads kill information.
As an example, google "cbd oil vs cbd isolate" or "why is cbd isolate in powder form...", in order to understand the difference and the relation betweens the 2 components (knowing Canabidiol should already be an oil, as its name suggest) and why cbd isolate is under the form of powder and not liquid as CBD oil.
Everything that come in the first results pages are fake blog posts from commercial sites or commercial offers. We quickly understand one contains the other after reading the first 3 pages from the result. But we never find an article explaining the actual chimical nature of cbd isolate (or pure form of cbd) or even an actual scientific study about cbd.
It's only the same and repeated argument, "article" after "article" about one pure form contained in another... and that for the first several result pages from a meta-search engine like searx (searx.be in this example with setting settle to include in general results Bing, Google, Yahoo, Yandex, DuckDuckGo and StartPage).
The good information has been covered under a thick layer of low density infomertial bullshit.
It's like trying to watch a movie in the middle of car traffic : You can't hear anything from the movie original soundtrack.
It take to further research, like "why is cannabidiol a powder", to have access in the first result page to actual independant articles for cbd, but under the form of its less "commercial" name, "cannabidiol"... to learn that lot of claims about cbd are not founded on actual scientific researches.
In short, the word CBD have been hijacked by commercial entities for profit and lost the biggest chunk of its actual meaning.
Information is lost in the process.
And I still don't know why cbd isolate is in powder form.