3 ms·
my argument is that performance doesn't matter if user experience isn't affected. if it is, then sure, performance becomes a moral issue. but if there is no e
by kmlx 7y ago
my argument is that performance doesn't matter if user experience isn't affected.
if it is, then sure, performance becomes a moral issue.
but if there is no effect, then poor performance simply becomes a technical issue.
- kdmccormick 7y agoSure, but the entire article is about how experience is widely being affected by poor performance. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make outside of pedantics.
- kmlx 7y agopoor performance is not a pre-requisite of bad experience. in reality it's a combination of UI & UX that contributes the most to bad experiences. not poor performance. so don't focus on poor performance when there is no effect. and even when there is a marginal effect, UI & UX matter a lot more and could even negate the poor performance aspect. so my point: UI&UX > performance. almost every single time. all of this is based on various analysis i have done for a whole slew of clients dating back to 10 years ago.
- KaiserPro 7y ago_The_ tangible example put forward is that it takes 60 seconds to render a page, and that phone is only a year old. If you wish to argue the semantics, rather than the subject of the matter, I'll take that as your tacit agreement that if you can't use a website, that's generally bad.