3 ms·

Ahh, that's more forgivable then. I'm still not sure what's up with that date, though.

• ced 20y ago
  Read the italized subtext below the title. I also got caught by the May 2007 date at first. It might be intentionally misleading.
  • BrandonM 20y ago
    Right, I saw that, but I read the article (thanks to jkush's submission) on the 8th, and the article's date is May 10. Anyways, it's not important, just a pointless observation.
    • brlewis 20y ago
      I would guess it's the date that will be printed on newsstand issues. I noticed some time ago that a lot of magazines post-date themselves, presumably because people are less likely to buy a magazine that's dated a week ago.