> "and need to be reused circa 7.100 times for non organic" No. The conclusion in that study is flawed. They compared across a range of different dimensions, a

> "and need to be reused circa 7.100 times for non organic" No. The conclusion in that study is flawed. They compared across a range of different dimensions, and then took the worst dimension they could find and used that scale only. That's bullshit. Miljøstyrelsen took some flak over it.