> It's disingenuous to the consumer. How is it disingenuous? If the numbers are to be believed people would get checks for under $1. So I'm pretty sure they w

> It's disingenuous to the consumer. How is it disingenuous? If the numbers are to be believed people would get checks for under $1. So I'm pretty sure they will be, as the FTC says "disappointed with the amount they receive". It's actually good advice, (absent raising the payment pool).