> And staying on the topic of mutexes, that "just spawn another thread for every 64 items you want to wait on" (which I already knew about) is about the hackies

> And staying on the topic of mutexes, that "just spawn another thread for every 64 items you want to wait on" (which I already knew about) is about the hackiest shit ever. Is this surprising to you? I already told you it would be a hack because I told you there is a better and proper solution for the actual problem you were encountering. You're stubbornly insisting for no reason on actively doing something bizarre, and you're frustrated you need an obtuse hack to make it happen? If you're trying so hard to "stay on the topic of mutexes" why do you trash WFMO for the "silly 64 item cap" and then repeatedly refuse to provide a single situation in which waiting on 64 mutexes would actually come up as a legitimate problem? Somehow you find the inability to use a wrong method to solve a problem whose existence you can't even show evidence of to be "silly"?