3 ms·
I'm confused about the math here. This article is apparently current (published two days ago), and given that it's 2019, if he was indeed born in 1897, that wou
by apendleton 7y ago
I'm confused about the math here. This article is apparently current (published two days ago), and given that it's 2019, if he was indeed born in 1897, that would make him either 121 or 122, not 119, right?
- rm445 7y agoBut the article is partly about a film documentary. Presumably the difference is the time for editing and release and he was/claimed to be 119 when it was filmed.