6 ms·
> Stricter gun laws. In a country of literal ninjas and samurais, this is the most inconsequential of all the reasons you gave.
by d0100 7y ago
> Stricter gun laws.
In a country of literal ninjas and samurais, this is the most inconsequential of all the reasons you gave.
- nostalgk 7y agoPretty sure the average citizen doesn't carry the Daishō any longer these days. Unless they're all actually ninjas with concealed weapons.
- tyrust 7y agoI assume you're joking, but this is sorta racist and also dismissive of the value of stricter gun regulations.
- d0100 7y agoIt is dismissive of stricter gun regulations, but not at all racist. Take off your racist-colored glasses and just look at history.
- tyrust 7y agoIt is racist. It is making generalizations of people in an entire country based on old history. It would be like calling the US a country of literal cowboys.
- albatruss 7y agoThe value of stricter gun regulations is actually minimal - we already have the effective ones in place. Take a look at the studies for yourself, e.g. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309755075_Does_Gun_Control_Reduce_Violent_Crime https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309755075_Does_Gun_...
- tyrust 7y agoSorry I don't really have time to get into this. I looked very briefly at that study. It compares US cities to other US cities using data from 1990. I would be more interested in how the US stacks up against other countries that don't have to act within the limitations of the Second Amendment. More recent data would probably be valuable as well.