5 ms·
Plus the project lacks in features, you can't compare it to OpenVPN, it basically has done one sinlge usecase, for one OS, etc. So basically the author thought
by Erlich_Bachman 7y ago
Plus the project lacks in features, you can't compare it to OpenVPN, it basically has done one sinlge usecase, for one OS, etc.
So basically the author thought it was simple enough for him to write a new software, but not simple enough to setup OpenVPN? (which anyone can do, especially in the shared secret case?) This project smells.
I would not recommend anyone to use this project, it seems like something the author have simply enjoyed writing, not something that is created for using.
Also how is "using ports 80 and 443" is a new "feature" when every other VPN can do exactly that?
- vardump 7y ago> Plus the project lacks in features, you can't compare it to OpenVPN, it basically has done one sinlge usecase, for one OS, etc. Looks like mainly just Windows is missing? I didn't check it carefully, but seems to be fine on macOS and Linux. Not sure if the server would run on macOS, but I don't think that would be a common use case.