4 ms·
That is a common trend in all kinds of enforcement jobs. As the number of rule breakers gets lower, the rules get tougher to compensate. For police officers, se
by bjourne 7y ago
That is a common trend in all kinds of enforcement jobs. As the number of rule breakers gets lower, the rules get tougher to compensate. For police officers, security guards and bouncers it means that they will intervene in less and less serious offences. But it appears it works the same in other kinds of professions too. For example, dental health is improving around the world so dentists are spending more of their time with cosmetic issues because fewer patients have holes in their teeth. It's even the same in software development. What do you do when there are no major bugs to fix? You spend your time fixing all the minor irrelevant issues!
I think the empirical evidence is soundly against the idea of people being lazy. People will always find stuff to do because almost no one likes rolling their thumbs all day.
- rodgerd 7y ago> What do you do when there are no major bugs to fix? You spend your time fixing all the minor irrelevant issues! Frameworks, frameworks everywhere.
- BigJono 7y agoNothing kills time as effectively as a nice casual game of dependency jenga.
- rv-de 7y agoThere just aren't any important and big problems left to solve - I suppose we are born into a very lucky century </sarcasm>
- vincent-toups 7y ago"It's even the same in software development. What do you do when there are no major bugs to fix?" ... Where do you work?
- logfromblammo 7y agoAnd where do we send our resumes?