>Is there a specific men’s rights subgroup the author is referring to that’s very loud Yes, and, as usual with loud, antagonistic subgroups, they look from the

>Is there a specific men’s rights subgroup the author is referring to that’s very loud Yes, and, as usual with loud, antagonistic subgroups, they look from the outside like part of the larger group's definition. But that's not an excuse - I wish people like the author would be more generous when talking about the larger groups. Men's rights are particularly affected by this, because it's a topic with both a lot of legitimate grievances and illegitimate hatred among its ranks.