4 ms·
The author appears to lump anyone of opposing views together. Flat earth - trivial to disprove, ok Anti-vacation - not trivial, but a huge amount of work has b
by david38 7y ago
The author appears to lump anyone of opposing views together.
Flat earth - trivial to disprove, ok
Anti-vacation - not trivial, but a huge amount of work has been done to show anyone who isn’t totally shut down the glaring before/after situation of vaccines, so ok
Men’s Rights? Seriously? Is the author saying men have no rights? Some of the things that fall under the men’s rights umbrella are the draft, lack of help for homeless men vs women, biased family court, little recognition when a victim of domestic violence (interestingly the CDC recognizes that), biased prison sentences, vastly higher rates of on the job injuries, etc.
So is the author saying anything that happens to a man his own fault?
Is there a specific men’s rights subgroup the author is referring to that’s very loud and just goes around saying men never do anything bad?
This is like saying “civil rights” people are a bunch of angry people with no reason to be angry.
- happytoexplain 7y ago>Is there a specific men’s rights subgroup the author is referring to that’s very loud Yes, and, as usual with loud, antagonistic subgroups, they look from the outside like part of the larger group's definition. But that's not an excuse - I wish people like the author would be more generous when talking about the larger groups. Men's rights are particularly affected by this, because it's a topic with both a lot of legitimate grievances and illegitimate hatred among its ranks.