That's completely inaccurate. 1. Every vote further secures the blockchain voting process. The only way to overcome this is with a 51% attack, so every vote c

That's completely inaccurate. 1. Every vote further secures the blockchain voting process. The only way to overcome this is with a 51% attack, so every vote cast further ensures the validity of the entire chain. 2. The chain can be public and anonymous, which gives every voter a verifiable way of understanding their vote. They can look and ensure that their vote was cast exactly as they intended, but it also allows administrators a way to review the votes. The core part that the article got wrong was that county administrators have a definite way of pre-tabulating as well as tabulating votes.