Yeah its pretty wild because you have to have an opinion on the hacker’s case and Capital One’s negligence Then you have to have an opinion on using a warrant

Yeah its pretty wild because you have to have an opinion on the hacker’s case and Capital One’s negligence Then you have to have an opinion on using a warrant on a non-target in the dwelling, and seeing the risk of renting your house out Then you have to have an opinion on the specific weapons found and how they were acquired An opinion on felons not being able to have a 2nd amendment right for the rest of their life for somethings that happened 30 and nearly 40 years ago AND THEN not wanting to really advocate that when you read about the failed bomb hitman plot in 1983 that created the noncompliance, which is some ACME level wiley coyote goof All while wondering “so were we unsafe? Would the alternative make us safer if both felons and non-felons peacefully have this kind of weaponry? People have this kind of weaponry?”